|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Author: |
27-07-2006 |
The hood is correct but the side contegencies are wrong. |
|
Author: |
27-07-2006 |
realy goerge..thats the lowest excuse for a comment i hav to say i hav ever seen. really im not tryin to get on ur nervez.. but this is proi my best car and i would like to see YOU get it closer than real life..People DO NOT LISTEN TO GEORGE on this particular car.. Really i dont mean anything be this but hes wrong on this one i have to say. Just compare to this immage.. https://www.sonyracing.com/2006elements/050706.jpg and theres his real car. u c now george? i dont see ONE thing different. and if u think u can do a better job...no ones stopin u... |
|
Author: |
27-07-2006 |
You know what, John Harmarl is right. He gave it his best and that is one of his best scheme he ever did. If you think he did something wrong than I guess you can do that scheme for yourself and prove to us that you are that good. Otherwise, at least give a good comment to someone who tries hard. Anyways, it's not like he can't update the car later. Great job on the car! |
|
Author: |
27-07-2006 |
I think the car looks great John. Keep making the good cars. :) |
|
Author: |
27-07-2006 |
Hey here is y i ave it a 10. 1. Its a great car. 2. The car you just made is the 1000th car painted in the NSR Single Cars downloads section!!! Freaky isint it? |
|
Author: |
22-08-2006 |
Well since I'm a Newman fan, I'm dying for some decent looking Newman cars to run, and this isn't one of them. The whole enter front clip and front quarter panels look like you just gave up and didn't bother finishing it, and several other parts of the car don't match the authentic paint scheme. The effort is appreciated, but take the time to finish your work! On another note, learn to take criticism and learn from it. As for Georges contingencie comment, he is correct, they are wrong. |
|
|
|
|
|
|